This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Mar. 18, 2015

Free speech debates are misconceived: It's all symbolic

The only proper basis for a free speech claim is whether government is attempting to prevent an audience from receiving certain ideas. By Lawrence A. Alexander


By Lawrence A. Alexander


There have been and continue to be numerous law review articles and judicial opinions debating whether something is or is not "speech" within the meaning of freedom of speech - for example, computer code, tattoos, "Likes" on Facebook, and even begging. And almost 50 years ago, the court distinguished "speech" from "symbolic speech," concluding that the latter was due less constitutional protection t...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up