This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Mar. 17, 2015

LETTER: An outright misreading of recent gun decision

I understand Anthony Caso is a professor of law. And so I expect him to know the difference between a ruling that "something cannot be done" and a ruling that "nothing can be done." By Jack Quirk

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR COLUMN

I understand Anthony Caso is a professor of law. I also understand that he authored an amicus brief to the U.S. Supreme Court supporting the view of the prevailing parties in a matter involving the Second Amendment. And so I expect him to know the difference between a ruling that "something cannot be done" and a ruling that "nothing can be done."

Yet in his recent guest column ("Circuit cancels rights, yet again,"...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up