This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Civil Rights

May 17, 2005

Capital Case Heading Back To Trial

SAN FRANCISCO - Courts continue to wrestle with how to define whether capital murder defendants are retarded. In three successive court rulings, including one issued late Friday, there is still no definitive answer whether Jorge Vidal Jr. meets the legal definition of retardation.

By Peter Blumberg
Daily Journal Staff Writer
        SAN FRANCISCO - Courts continue to wrestle with how to define whether capital murder defendants are retarded.
        In three successive court rulings, including one issued late Friday, there is still no definitive answer whether Jorge Vidal Jr. meets the leg...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up