This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Focus (Forum & Focus)

Sep. 11, 2008

Efficiency v. Risk: 'Cable Connection' Offers a New Tradeoff

A recent state high court decision gives lawyers and clients a significant new choice about how they arbitrate their disputes, writes David A. DeGroot. - Forum Column

FORUM COLUMN

By David A. DeGroot
This article appears on Page 6

      The California Supreme Court fundamentally rethought how courts should deal with arbitration in its recent decision in Cable Connection Inc. v. DIRECTV, 2008 DJDAR 13491. The court ruled that parties can agree to court review of arbitration decisions. The decision gives lawyers and clients a significant new choice about how they arbitrate the...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up