These articles appear on Page 6
The Daily Journal's Aug. 27 article on employment cases in the California Supreme Court ("Employment Cases Split California High Court") seems biased in favor of employers. The article quotes only employer-lawyers until the very end of the article, in the carry-over. Moreover, it states that "lawyers on both sides of the debate" say that "a moderate court has emerged," but when it actually gets to ...
The Daily Journal's Aug. 27 article on employment cases in the California Supreme Court ("Employment Cases Split California High Court") seems biased in favor of employers. The article quotes only employer-lawyers until the very end of the article, in the carry-over. Moreover, it states that "lawyers on both sides of the debate" say that "a moderate court has emerged," but when it actually gets to ...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In




