By Nicolas Taborek
Daily Journal Staff Writer
LOS ANGELES - Prosecutors have opposed a double jeopardy claim by accused pornographer Ira Isaacs, whose federal obscenity case resulted in a mistrial earlier this year.
Isaacs should be tried again, they argue, because the judge acted properly by ending the first trial after pornography was discovered on his public Web site.
 ...
Daily Journal Staff Writer
LOS ANGELES - Prosecutors have opposed a double jeopardy claim by accused pornographer Ira Isaacs, whose federal obscenity case resulted in a mistrial earlier this year.
Isaacs should be tried again, they argue, because the judge acted properly by ending the first trial after pornography was discovered on his public Web site.
 ...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In




