Securities
Apr. 2, 2003
'America West' Rejects Strict Standard On Stock Price Effect
Focus Column - Securities Law - By M. Chapman Findlay, David R. Garcia and G. Michael Phillips - Some 15 years ago, the U.S. Supreme Court considered the question of whether the element of reliance in fraud claims under Section 10b of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 would, in effect, require each member of a potential claimant class to offer proof of individualized reliance. See Basic Inc. v. Levinson , 485 U.S. 224 (1988).
Securities Law
By M. Chapman Findlay, David R. Garcia and G. Michael Phillips
...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In