This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Intellectual Property

Mar. 18, 2003

Invention Record Is Crucial, Even Without Patent Filing

Focus Column - Intellectual Property - By Michael J. Sacksteder - When the issue is whether an accused patent infringer came up with an invention before the inventor named on the patent, the otherwise-unsupported word of even a large number of witnesses usually is insufficient to invalidate an issued patent based on the prior sale, public use or invention of the product or method claimed in the patent.

        Focus Column
        
        Intellectual Property
        
        By Michael J. Sacksteder
        
        When the issu...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Sign up for Daily Journal emails