This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Intellectual Property

Mar. 18, 2003

'Victoria's Secret' Case Illuminates Confusion Over 'Dilution' Definition

Focus Column - By William F. Abrams and Paul E. Thomas - When Moseley v. V Secret Catalogue Inc. , 2003 U.S.Sct.Lexis 1945 (U.S. Sct. March 4, 2003), a case involving a dispute over the interpretation of the Federal Trademark Dilution Act of 1996, came before the U.S. Supreme Court for oral argument Nov. 12, 2002, the petitioners barely had gotten started when one of the justices interrupted: "It would help me a lot if you explained to me what dilution is."

Focus Column
        
By William F. Abrams and Paul E. Thomas
        
        When Moseley v. V Secret Catalogue Inc., 2003 U.S.Sct.Lexis 1945 (U.S. Sct. March 4, 2003), a case involving a dispute over the interpretation of the Federal Trademark Dilution Act of 1996, came before the U.S. Supreme Court...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Sign up for Daily Journal emails