This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Criminal

Apr. 4, 2000

Panel Prejudice

Panel Prejudice Juror Misconduct Deprives a Defendant of Constitutional Rights Certain extraneous materials, such as dictionary definitions and references to the Bible, have been recognized as highly prejudicial in numerous cases.

By David S. Olson
        Juror misconduct can taint a jury's verdict. In a criminal action, the jury's consideration of extraneous matter deprives a defendant of his constitutional rights of confrontation, cross-examination and effective assistance of counsel. For example, in Turner v. Louisiana, 379 U.S. 466 (1965), the death penalty was reversed where the sequestered jury was p...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up