Daily Journal Staff Writer
SAN FRANCISCO - Sometimes science and the law don't match up, and that was the situation in a case heard by the state Supreme Court Thursday.
The central issue in the case is whether an expert witness should have been allowed to testify about validity problems with DUI breathalyzer tests.
Breathalyzers operate under the assumption that the partition ratio - the conversion of alcohol in ...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In