By E. Joseph Connaughton
Arbitration is hip. After the California Supreme Court decided Armendariz v. Foundation Health Psychare Services Inc., 24 Cal.4th 83 (2000), and the U.S. Supreme Court followed with Circuit City v. Adams, 121 S.Ct. 1302 (2001), many law firms have begun considering full-bl...
Arbitration is hip. After the California Supreme Court decided Armendariz v. Foundation Health Psychare Services Inc., 24 Cal.4th 83 (2000), and the U.S. Supreme Court followed with Circuit City v. Adams, 121 S.Ct. 1302 (2001), many law firms have begun considering full-bl...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In