By Paul J. Killion
A recent 2nd District Court of Appeal decision underscores some basic points about the purpose and limits of the appellant's reply brief. In Save the Sunset Strip Coalition v. City of West Hollywood, 87 Cal.App.4th 1172 (2001), the court addressed a dispute concerning West Hollywood's development of the Sunset Strip.
&nbs...
A recent 2nd District Court of Appeal decision underscores some basic points about the purpose and limits of the appellant's reply brief. In Save the Sunset Strip Coalition v. City of West Hollywood, 87 Cal.App.4th 1172 (2001), the court addressed a dispute concerning West Hollywood's development of the Sunset Strip.
&nbs...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In