This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
You must have a membership to view this page.

Appellate Practice

Jul. 31, 2001

Purpose and Limits

'Absent justification for failing to present an argument earlier, we will not consider an issue raised for the first time in a reply brief.'

        By Paul J. Killion

        A recent 2nd District Court of Appeal decision underscores some basic points about the purpose and limits of the appellant's reply brief. In Save the Sunset Strip Coalition v. City of West Hollywood, 87 Cal.App.4th 1172 (2001), the court addressed a dispute concerning West Hollywood's development of the Sunset Strip.
 &nbs...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up