This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Government

Apr. 25, 2007

U.S. High Court Looks Warily at State's Traffic-Stop Ruling

WASHINGTON - In a case testing the Fourth Amendment rights of car passengers, the U.S. Supreme Court seemed highly skeptical Monday of a pro-prosecution ruling by the California Supreme Court that cleared the way for the state to use drug-related evidence obtained against a Yuba City man during an illegal traffic stop.

By Brent Kendall
Daily Journal Staff Writer

      WASHINGTON - In a case testing the Fourth Amendment rights of car passengers, the U.S. Supreme Court seemed highly skeptical Monday of a pro-prosecution ruling by the California Supreme Court that cleared the way for the state to use drug-related evidence obtained against a Yuba City man during an illegal traffic stop.
      The key issue in the cas...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up