This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
You must have a membership to view this page.

Law Practice

Apr. 24, 2007

Misapprehending 'Apprendi'

Forum Column - By Mitchell Keiter - A recent decision wrongly allows a judge to circumvent a jury in criminal cases.

FORUM COLUMN

By Mitchell Keiter

      The Apprendi-Blakely doctrine insists that the jury, not the court, has ultimate fact-finding authority in criminal trials. But last month's decision in Porter v. Superior Court, 148 Cal.App.4th 889 (Cal. App. 6th Dist. March 20, 2007), broke ground in holding that even where a constitutionally sufficient amount of evidence is presented and a jury finds guilt beyond a reasonable do...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up