This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Dec. 3, 2010

Does Proposition 26 Limit New California Environmental Quality Act Mitigation?

The supermajority requirement under Proposition 26 may hinder environmental mitigation measures. By Ryan M. Leaderman of DLA Piper.


By Ryan M. Leaderman


In early November, California voters approved Proposition 26. It classifies a local government's levy, charge or exaction of any kind (with a few limited exceptions) as a tax that requires a vote of two-thirds of the local electorate to impose. Proposition 26 categorizes both a charge and an exaction under the umbrella of a tax, but does not provide a corresponding exception for "an exaction imposed as a condition of property develo...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up