This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Nov. 6, 2010

Eminent Domain Case Clarifies Test For Determining Litigation Expenses

Government agencies could be on the hook for litigation expenses if their final offers of compensation in eminent domain actions are unreasonable. By Rick E. Rayl and Bradford B. Kuhn of Nossaman.

By Rick E. Rayl and Bradford B. Kuhn

In California eminent domain cases, government agencies must take care in formulating the final offer of compensation they make before trial. If the court concludes after trial that the agency's offer was unreasonable - and that the property/business owner's final demand was reasonable - the property/business owner is entitled to an award of litigation expenses, including attorneys fees. (See Code of Civil Procedure Section 1250.410.) ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up