Daily Journal Staff Writer
SAN FRANCISCO - At a case management conference Thursday over a lawsuit in which retired National Football League players claim Manatt, Phelps & Phillips should have won more money for them in a licensing dispute with their union, a federal judge wasted no time asking a question that seemed to strike right at the heart of the matter: Why didn't the players object to the settlement in the original case?...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In