By Susan McRae
Daily Journal Staff Writer
After more than a decade of bizarre twists and turns, a Beverly Hills attorney won an appeal of a contempt order for refusing to answer questions at a judgment debtor examination.
A three-member 2nd District Court of Appeal panel ruled Friday that Frances Diaz does not have to answer questions about her personal finances because she is not liable for a judgment of fines and attorney fee...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In