Judges and Judiciary
Nov. 19, 2003
Kuhl's Critic Distorted Jurist's Words
On Nov. 12, professor Catherine Fisk argued that the Senate should not confirm the president's nomination of Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Carolyn B. Kuhl to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. Fisk's article ("Senate Must Reject Nominee Who Blatantly Distorts Truth," Forum) was an unfair and inaccurate attempt to assassinate the character of an outstanding judge.
On Nov. 12, professor Catherine Fisk argued that the Senate should not confirm the president's nomination of Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Carolyn B. Kuhl to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. Fisk's article ("Senate Must Reject Nominee Who Blatantly Distorts Truth," Forum) was an unfair and inaccurate attempt to assassinate the character of an outstanding judge.
&...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In