This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Aug. 11, 2012

Switch in time that blew everyone's mind: part two

The parallels between Justice Roberts' vote to uphold a minimum wage law and Chief Justice John Roberts' vote to uphold the individual mandate are eerie. By Ben Feuer

Ben Feuer

Chairman
Complex Appellate Litigation Group LLP

Appellate Law

Email: ben.feuer@calg.com

Northwestern Univ School of Law

See more...


By Ben Feuer


The parallels between Justice Owen Roberts' vote to uphold Washington's minimum wage law in Parrish and Chief Justice John Roberts' vote to uphold the Affordable Care Act's individual mandate in National Federation of Independent Business v. Sebelius (NFIB) are eerie. But is the comparison apt?


It just might be. Although historians debate whether Justice Owen Roberts actually switched his vote in Parr...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up