Intellectual Property
Jul. 22, 2003
'Neo-Flo' Court Blurs Law to Allow Infringement Discovery
Focus Column - Intellectual Property - By Henry C. Su - In May, a magistrate judge in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania ordered the plaintiffs in a patent-infringement action to disclose their claim interpretations in response to the defendant's written discovery, over the plaintiffs' objections that their interpretations should be considered attorney-client privileged communications and attorney work product. S.S. White Burs Inc. v. Neo-Flo Inc. , 2003 U.S.Dist.LEXIS 7718 (E.D. Pa.
Intellectual Property
...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In