Should the government-as-employer have a free hand to fire a government employee in retaliation for the employee having given "truthful sworn testimony that was compelled by subpoena and was not a part of the employee's ordinary job responsibilities"? On Monday, that is one of the questions the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments on in the case of Lane v. Franks, No. 13-483.
Edward Lane worked as the director ...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In




