California Supreme Court
Jan. 9, 2013
Clarity comes to primary assumption of risk doctrine
The state Supreme Court closed out 2012 with a notable decision that resolved a long-standing uncertainty in the state's "primary assumption of risk" doctrine. By Jeffrey M. Lenkov and Steven J. Renick
The state Supreme Court closed out 2012 with a notable decision that resolved a long-standing uncertainty in the state's "primary assumption of risk" doctrine. In Nalwa v. Cedar Fair, L.P., 2013 DJDAR 10 (Dec. 31, 2012), the high court held that the primary assumption of risk doctrine - which eliminates liability when an injury is caused by a risk inherent in an activity - is not limited to ...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In