Litigation
Jan. 5, 2013
Eminent domain opinions focus on 'just compensation'
A recent decision continues a trend of opinions focusing on the trial court's role as gatekeeper in deciding what valuation evidence can be considered in determining "just compensation." By Bradford Kuhn and Bernadette Duran-Brown
It has been quite a busy year for takings cases, and the state Court of Appeal provided one last published eminent domain opinion just before 2012 came to a close. The new decision, County of Glenn v. Foley, 2012 DJDAR 17177 (Cal. App. 3d Dist. Dec. 21, 2012), continued 2012's trend of opinions focusing on the trial court's role as gatekeeper in deciding what valuation evidence can be presented to a jury for ...
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In