This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Constitutional Law

Sep. 19, 2003

9th Ponders the Legality of Cannabis Seizures

SAN FRANCISCO - When the U.S. Supreme Court rejected medical necessity as a defense to the use of medical marijuana two years ago, it left wide open the question of possible constitutional rights violations by the federal seizure of state-sanctioned cannabis.

        By Pamela A. MacLean
        Daily Journal Staff Writer
        SAN FRANCISCO - When the U.S. Supreme Court rejected medical necessity as a defense to the use of medical marijuana two years ago, it left wide open the question of possible constitutional rights violations by the federal seizure of state-sanctio...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$887 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?