This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Jul. 31, 2013

Injured can sue even after settling

As a recent case shows, collateral estoppel does not prevent a plaintiff from pursuing medical expenses under the tortfeasor's insurance policy even though the liability insurer has settled. By Fernando D. Vargas


By Fernando D. Vargas


In Barnes v. Western Heritage Insurance Co., 217 Cal. App. 4th 249 (2013), the 3rd District Court of Appeal held that the collateral estoppel rule does not prevent a plaintiff from pursuing coverage for medical expenses under the tortfeasor's commercial general liability insurance policy even though the tortfeasor's liability insurer has settled because "An insurer's obligation to indemnify its insured under the liabi...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up