This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Labor/Employment

Jul. 30, 2013

Unpaid interns: keep 'em, pay 'em or let 'em go

Fox Searchlight's recent ordeal is an important reminder that the mere labeling of a worker as an "intern" does not automatically remove the worker from the protections of wage and hour laws. By Rebecca M. Aragon and Anthony G. Ly


By Rebecca M. Aragon and Anthony G. Ly


A recent decision out of the Southern District of New York, Glatt v. Fox Searchlight Pictures, Inc., No. 11 Civ. 6784 (June 11, 2013), provides extra fuel for the recent trend of class action lawsuits filed by unpaid interns claiming they are employees protected under federal and state labor laws. The interns in Glatt performed administrative office duties for a production company incorporated for the purpose o...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up