This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Litigation

Jul. 27, 2013

Contractual attorney fee awards, for tort claims?

A recent appellate decision is a reminder that a party can lose the contract claims and still be the prevailing party for an attorney fee award. By Gary A. Watt


By Gary A. Watt


A recent appellate decision is a reminder that a party can lose the contract claims and still be the prevailing party for an attorney fee award. The reason is that the party prevailed on the tort claims and a broadly worded contractual attorney fee provision applied to the overall dispute. The case, Maynard v. BTI Group, Inc., 216 Cal. App. 4th 984 (May 29, 2013), provides the opportunity for counsel to review the operative principle...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up