This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Jul. 25, 2013

Courts take a closer look at confidential witnesses in securities fraud cases

Plaintiffs have increasingly sought to use statements by so-called "confidential witnesses" to show scienter in securities fraud actions. Sometimes, this practice is abused. By Glenn K. Vanzura and Steven N. Feldman


By Glenn K. Vanzura and Steven N. Feldman


Prior to the enactment of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act (PSLRA), shareholder plaintiffs asserting a claim under Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act and SEC Rule 10b-5 could aver the state of mind element of their claim - also known as scienter - "simply by saying that scienter existed." See In re GlenFed, Inc. Securities Litigation, 42 F.3d 1541, 1547 (9th Cir. 1994). In 1995, Con...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up