On July 11, in Latinos Unidos del Valle de Napa y Solano v. County of Napa, 2013 DJDAR 9129, the 1st District Court of Appeal held that Napa County's restrictive density bonus ordinance impermissibly conflicts with the state density bonus law (Government Code Section 65915). In particular, the appellate court held that the ordinance improperly requires a developer to dedicate a larger percentage of its units to affordable housing ...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In