This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Jul. 20, 2013

Until FDA acts, generic drug consumers left without remedy

The U.S. high court's recent rulings limiting generic drug manufacturers' liability exposure are perplexing given the purpose of the federal law preempting these claims. By Patricia L. Zlaket


By Patricia L. Zlaket


Unfortunately for millions of consumers, the legal battles related to labeling for generic drugs rage on.


In 2011, the U.S. Supreme Court decision in PLIVA, Inc., et al. v. Mensing gave more power to drug companies - ruling that generic makers cannot be held responsible for failure to warn about a drug's side-effects, since the generic maker is only making a "copy" of the brand drug and must follow the brand na...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up