This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Constitutional Law

Sep. 11, 2012

Stolen valor and prosecutorial discretion

If the analysis of the constitutionality of a law is affected by the prosecutor's choice of whom to prosecute, does this influence the exercise of prosecutorial discretion?

2nd Appellate District, Division 2

Brian M. Hoffstadt

Associate Justice, California Court of Appeal

UCLA School of Law, 1995

In United States v. Alvarez, 132 S. Ct. 2537 (2012), the U.S. Supreme Court struck down in its entirety the Stolen Valor Act, which made it a federal crime to lie about receiving certain military honors. The defendant in that case was Xavier Alvarez, and he falsely claimed to be a Medal of Honor recipient - not to obtain a government contract or to commit fraud - but rather as a boast at a local water district board meeting in what the Supreme Court called a "pathetic attempt to g...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Sign up for Daily Journal emails