By Lawrence W. Schonbrun
The upcoming hearing on the proposed settlement of the Uber employee/independent contractor class action (O'Connor v. Uber Technologies) is shaping up as unusually contentious. What I find particularly interesting is that charges and countercharges of attorney greed are said to be at the center of the controversy. Objectors' New York counsel, Hunter Shkolnik, accuses "greedy" class counsel of selling out the class...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In