This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...
You must have a membership to view this page.

Labor/Employment

Oct. 23, 2010

Plaintiffs Try to Block Class Review

Plaintiffs' lawyers suing Wal-Mart in the largest gender discrimination class action in U.S. history laid out their arguments Thursday for why the case should not be heard by the U.S. Supreme Court.

By Catherine Ho

Daily Journal Staff Writer

Plaintiffs' lawyers suing Wal-Mart Stores Inc. in the largest gender-discrimination class action in U.S. history laid out arguments Thursday for why the U.S. Supreme Court should not reconsider class certification.

The class of approximately 1.5 million female workers alleges Wal-Mart, the largest private employer in the U.S., discriminated against women by paying them less and by ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up