This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Litigation

Oct. 14, 2010

A Setback for Civil Litigation Reform

A case empowering government agencies to retain private counsel in civil actions raises ethical issues. By Thomas Gede and Nima Javaherian of Bingham McCutchen.

By Tom Gede and Nima Javaherian

California businesses, and potentially businesses across the nation, face the risk of more enforcement actions and litigation from state government agencies as the result of a state Supreme Court decision filed July 26 (County of Santa Clara et al. v. Superior Court of Santa Clara County (Atlantic Richfield)). The Court generally affirmed the ability of government attorneys in certain cases to retain private attorney...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up