This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Oct. 13, 2010

The Novartis Verdict: Impact on Employers and Lessons Learned

Slammed with the largest jury verdict ever in an employment discrimination case, what Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. did wrong. By Gary Siniscalco and Lauri Damrell of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe.

By Gary Siniscalco and Lauri Damrell

For 10 years, Working Mother magazine ranked Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. as a "Top 100" company for women. Nevertheless, in May 2010, a jury found Novartis liable for gender pay and promotion discrimination and awarded a class of over 5,000 women $250 million in punitive damages. It was the largest ever jury verdict in an employment discrimination case. While Novartis argued throughout the trial th...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up