This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Focus (Forum & Focus)

Oct. 11, 2007

Combating Takings

Focus Column - By Ronald A. Zumbrun - Despite years of contrary jurisprudence at the federal level, California courts remain hesitant to provide compensation for private-property development that is impeded by government.

FOCUS COLUMN

By Ronald A. Zumbrun

      In 1939, Winston Churchill struggled with the task of forecasting the actions of Russia: "It is a riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma." The same can be said of the jurisprudential state of the U.S. Constitution's takings clause, as set forth in the Fifth Amendment: "[N]or shall private property be taken for public use without just compensation."
      ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up