This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Discipline

Jan. 7, 2004

Order Has Collateral Estoppel Effect on Ethical Breach Issue

Focus Column - Legal Ethics- By Alec H. Boyd The decision in A.I. Credit Corp. Inc. v. Aguilar & Sebastinelli, 2003 DJDAR 12988 (Nov. 25, 2003), should serve as a cautionary tale for attorneys confronted with the prospect of being disqualified from a representation. In A.I. Credit, the 1st District Court of Appeal held that a law firm disqualified from a representation for violating an ethical obligation is not entitled to payment for the services that it rendered.

        Focus Column
        
        Legal Ethics
        
        ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Sign up for Daily Journal emails