Labor/Employment
Jan. 6, 2004
Even Narrower Noncompete Covenant May Be Void
Focus Column - Employment Law - By David H. Raizman and Kaye E. Chaffee - Courts repeatedly have interpreted California's prohibition on covenants not to compete as a ban against all forms of such covenants, subject to narrow statutory exceptions. See, for example, Hill Med. Corp. v. Wycoff , 86 Cal.App.4th 895 (2001) ("[Business and Professions Code] Section 16600 presently sets out the general rule in California - covenants not to compete are void.").
Employment Law
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In