By James M. Sabovich
There is in certain legal and business circles a growing unease over the vitality of pre-emption defenses in tort cases where the defendant is ostensibly sued for doing what the government required it to do. The recent U.S. Supreme Court decision in Wyeth v. Levine, 2009 DJDAR 3199, finding no pre-emption in a pharmaceutical failure to warn case caused some. The subsequent White House memorandum to federal agencies that has bee...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In




