By Denis Binder
The greatest issue in toxic torts litigation over the past quarter-century has consistently been causation. In essence, plaintiffs must link their illness to the specific chemical(s) that the defendants exposed them to. Technically, the rule is that the plaintiff has the burden of proof by a preponderance of the evidence to show that the defendant's act more likely than not was a cause, not the cause, of his or her illness. See the cla...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$895, but save $100 when you subscribe today… Just $795 for the first year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In




