The collateral source rule continues to be one of the most misunderstood legal principles facing the legal community today to the detriment of counsel and their clients. Why that is may be attributed to counsel's failure to understand when insurance payments made to or on behalf of a plaintiff are not collateral source. A most recent example is the case of Garbell v. Conejo Hardwoods Inc., 2011 DJDAR 4966 (Cal. App. 2nd Dist. ...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In