This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Apr. 27, 2011

Public Entities Need Freedom to Do What Is Best for Their Communities

State appellate court was right to bar claims of "precondemnation" for seizure of property not intended for public use. By Mona M. Nemat of Best Best & Krieger LLP.


By Mona M. Nemat


The line between lawful action by a public entity and an unconstitutional taking has been blurry at best. Courts and commentators alike have grappled with the distinction, often failing to find one. Unfortunately, public entities often find themselves in a difficult situation when deciding whether to implement a program and face possible liability as a result, or do nothing and face another form of liability. This dilemma often causes public agen...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up