This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Apr. 23, 2011

Prop. 65: 25 Years and Still Going Strong

Steps companies can take to avoid facing a penalty under Proposition 65. By James Scadden and Rosemary Carson of Gordon & Rees LLP.


By James Scadden and Rosemary Carson


In 1986, California voters approved Proposition 65 to address concerns about exposure to toxic chemicals. Twenty-five years later, enforcement of the statute has not lost its punch. Indeed, Prop. 65 is irresistible to the "green movement" which has ushered in a new source of energy for Prop. 65 vigilantes. In February, at least four separate actions were filed for failure to comply with Prop. 65. Surging activity is ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up