This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Perspective

Apr. 21, 2011

Global Warming Isn't the Real Issue

Some 224 years after ratification of the Constitution, debates continue over the proper role of the judiciary. By Anthony T. Caso of Chapman University School of Law.


Anthony T. Caso


The recent Wisconsin Supreme Court election between incumbent Justice David Prosser and challenger JoAnne Kloppenburg has the country focused on judicial elections, as well it should be. Most of the commentary, however, has been on whether we should vote on judges and not why. The New York Times opined that U.S. Supreme Court justices ought instead to be selected by a "merit commission" - an idea that the Times

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up