This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Personal Injury & Torts

Mar. 9, 2012

Use of political question doctrine rejected in Navy asbestos case

Courts have heard Navy-related asbestos tort claims for decades without jurisdiction being questioned. By Michael Gurien of Waters, Kraus & Paul LLP


By Michael B. Gurien


Some attorneys for defendants involved in asbestos-related litigation have suggested that the state Supreme Court's recent decision in O'Neil v. Crane Co., 53 Cal. 4th 335 (2012) might support application of the political question doctrine to tort claims by former U.S. Navy sailors and their families for injuries and deaths caused by exposure to asbestos from products manufactured or supplied by private companies for use on Nav...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up