Daily Journal Staff Writer
SAN FRANCISCO -The state Supreme Court hinted at a possible compromise Tuesday in a battle over who owes attorney fees in meal and rest break cases.
Employers argue the law requires the prevailing party - whether it's the plaintiff or defendant - to pay the other side's attorney fees. Plaintiffs maintain they are immune from paying fees but that losing defendants should pay under laws designed ...
To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!
Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)
Already a subscriber?
Sign In