This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

California Supreme Court

Mar. 8, 2012

Justices weigh attorney fee awards in employment cases

The state Supreme Court hinted at a possible compromise Tuesday in a battle over who owes attorney fees in meal and rest break cases


By Laura Ernde


Daily Journal Staff Writer


SAN FRANCISCO -The state Supreme Court hinted at a possible compromise Tuesday in a battle over who owes attorney fees in meal and rest break cases.


Employers argue the law requires the prevailing party - whether it's the plaintiff or defendant - to pay the other side's attorney fees. Plaintiffs maintain they are immune from paying fees but that losing defendants should pay under laws designed ...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up