This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Law Practice

Mar. 3, 2012

Fee disputes: an ethical review of lawyer billing

In order to justify a billing, the activities of an attorney should be authorized, appropriate and reasonable. By Alexander S. Polsky of JAMS


By Alexander S. Polsky


Fee review has become common practice. Private companies regularly impose their values for time spent by attorneys, merely be reviewing the bills and comparing them to pre-set criteria. This approach is result oriented, designed to cut bills, and is of questionable ethics. The comments that follow focus on the issues an auditor, special master, arbitrator or reviewing court might consider when analyzing a fee dispute.


The activit...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up