This is the property of the Daily Journal Corporation and fully protected by copyright. It is made available only to Daily Journal subscribers for personal or collaborative purposes and may not be distributed, reproduced, modified, stored or transferred without written permission. Please click "Reprint" to order presentation-ready copies to distribute to clients or use in commercial marketing materials or for permission to post on a website. and copyright (showing year of publication) at the bottom.
Subscribe to the Daily Journal for access to Daily Appellate Reports, Verdicts, Judicial Profiles and more...

Intellectual Property

Feb. 29, 2012

Patent suits: Inconsistent application of attorney-client privilege

Given the lack of consensus, nobody should assume that invention disclosures or draft patent applications are privileged. By Mark Kachner of Knobbe Martens Olson & Bear LLP


By Mark Kachner


In nearly every patent infringement lawsuit, the accused infringer will attempt to discover patent prosecution files and related communications of the patent at issue because such documents are relevant to validity and claim scope. Yet, often district courts apply the attorney-client privilege to patent prosecution files in inconsistent ways.


In 2000, the Federal Circuit appeared to bring clarity to the issue when it decided In re Spa...

To continue reading, please subscribe.
For only $95 a month (the price of 2 article purchases)
Receive unlimited article access and full access to our archives,
Daily Appellate Report, award winning columns, and our
Verdicts and Settlements.
Or
$795 for an entire year!

Or access this article for $45
(Purchase provides 7-day access to this article. Printing, posting or downloading is not allowed.)

Already a subscriber?

Enewsletter Sign-up